I find it hard to reconcile Charles III’s long-professed devotion to the particular ( place, tradition, memory, rootedness, inherited forms, local character, civilizational continuity,...)with his apparent indifference to the erosion of England as a particular nation.
He speaks too eloquently about the need to protect what is organic, ancient, fragile, and locally rooted. Yet when the same logic is applied not to the English, and to England itself that concern seems to vanish. Funny.
Many who once admired this side of him are therefore deeply disappointed. They expected a king who understood the value of inheritance. Instead, his silence reads less like prudence than abandonment.
His devotion to the Nuremberg truth regime and multiculturalism seem to be more fundamental to his deep persona than any religious belief he holds.
Maybe he knows his power is limited so he is reserving it for esoteric matters. Regardless, his silence on mass immigration and mass rape is disappointing, and changing his title to "defender of the faiths" really destroyed his credibility for wanting to preserve anything local and rooted.
I seriously wonder if he's not just a muslim convert who thinks the mass rape of England is a necessary evil for creating some sort of mystical sultanate.
I find it hard to reconcile Charles III’s long-professed devotion to the particular ( place, tradition, memory, rootedness, inherited forms, local character, civilizational continuity,...)with his apparent indifference to the erosion of England as a particular nation.
He speaks too eloquently about the need to protect what is organic, ancient, fragile, and locally rooted. Yet when the same logic is applied not to the English, and to England itself that concern seems to vanish. Funny.
Many who once admired this side of him are therefore deeply disappointed. They expected a king who understood the value of inheritance. Instead, his silence reads less like prudence than abandonment.
His devotion to the Nuremberg truth regime and multiculturalism seem to be more fundamental to his deep persona than any religious belief he holds.
Maybe he knows his power is limited so he is reserving it for esoteric matters. Regardless, his silence on mass immigration and mass rape is disappointing, and changing his title to "defender of the faiths" really destroyed his credibility for wanting to preserve anything local and rooted.
I seriously wonder if he's not just a muslim convert who thinks the mass rape of England is a necessary evil for creating some sort of mystical sultanate.
Please find some interesting references:
http://www.daplastique.com/essay/the-rebirth-of-sacred-art
http://www.daplastique.com/essay/the-maze-of-ecstasy
http://www.adidafoundation.org/essays/the-eternal-war-between-orpheus-and-narcissus
http://acsforum.org/beyond-modernism-perfect-abstraction-in-adi-da-samrajs-orpheus-and-linead-suites
http://beezone.com/frank_marrero/orpheus.html
http://beezone.com/current/index-102.html The Pleasure Dome Law
http://www.fnmzoo.org/wisdom-teaching/a-contemplative-state-of-exaltation
http://fearnomore.vision/human/what-man-represents
In the multitude of words there is no want of sin. This is why someone like the author can use a multitude of words and not sin.
Excellent article, I love our Esoteric King! God Bless him.